THE FINAL PHASE OF THE 9-11 COVER-UP
By Christopher Bollyn
27 September 2007
Six years after the worst terrorist atrocity in U.S. history, not a single lawsuit filed by the relatives of the 9-11 victims has gone to trial. With only 21 cases remaining, it appears increasingly likely that the book may be closed on the 9-11 litigation without a single case ever being heard in court.
The 9-11 litigation process is approaching the final phase of the Zionist-run cover-up of what really happened on September 11, 2001.
There are two recent news items, which have not been widely reported, that indicate that the walling up of the truth is nearly complete. There are just a few remaining bricks left to be put into place - about 21 to be precise - and the wall hiding the truth will be finished.
21 CASES REMAIN
The first news item, from September 18, is that 14 of the 35 remaining suits filed by relatives of 9-11 victims, seeking compensation from the airlines and the foreign-owned airport security contractors, were settled out-of-court one week before the first case was to go to trial.
The first trial was to start on Monday, September 24 but that case was among those settled. The next trial is scheduled to begin on November 5.
It should be noted that this will not be a 9-11 trial in which any liability or accountability will be determined. In a most unusual reversal of legal procedure, U.S. District Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein has ordered that six trials for damages take place before any trial for liability.
Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein, an Orthodox Zionist Jew and devotee of the State of Israel, oversees all 9-11 litigation.
Judge Hellerstein, who oversees all 9-11 litigation, has done this, he says, in the hope that both sides may use the damage figures as a road map toward settlement.
Only 21 cases remain of the original 95 cases filed in federal court. The rest have all been settled or dismissed.
"The rush of settlements leaves open the question of whether any trials will take place," the New York Times reported on September 19, 2007.
HELLERSTEIN GETS SICK WORKER CASES
The second news item, from September 22, is that the lawsuits filed by some 300 workers allegedly sickened from working at Ground Zero will not be heard in New York state courts but will be moved to the federal court of - you guessed it - Alvin K. Hellerstein.
The state's Appellate Division ruled that all claims tied to injury, death or loss of property from the 9-11 attacks fall under the jurisdiction of Manhattan federal court.
This is clearly an incorrect ruling, however, because the worker lawsuits are not against the airlines or the airport security companies, which were relegated to Hellerstein. These "sick workers" cases are against the City of New York, which is clearly not within the judicial purview of the federal mandate of Judge Hellerstein.
This is a very unfair ruling and set-back which corrals all the workers' lawsuits into Hellerstein's courtroom. This ruling overturned a decision by a Manhattan Supreme Court judge, who had allowed the workers' bids for litigation to proceed in state court, even after they filed late notices of claim against the city.
Close to 9,000 lawsuits by workers whose health was affected by working at Ground Zero had already reportedly been filed in the federal court.
These developments reveal how the relatives of those killed on 9-11 have been effectively denied the discovery, justice, and accountability they have sought through litigation.
The law firm of Motley Rice represents all remaining families who lost loved ones aboard the airplanes involved in 9-11, according to the firm's press release of September 24, 2007. Alicia Ward, director of communications for Motley Rice, confirmed this and the next court date of November 5.
"Several of our clients chose to settle after we reached the amount that they wanted and after we completed years of discovery and investigations that were more extensive and probing than even that completed by the U.S. government's 9-11 Commission," attorney Joseph F. Rice said. "We gave them answers and accountability which was denied them by the U.S. government's victim compensation program."
The terms of the settlement, however, bar families from discussing the details so it appears highly unlikely that the evidence obtained by the "extensive investigations" and "years of discovery" will ever become part of the public record.
Mike Low, whose 28-year-old daughter, Sara, a flight attendant on American Airlines Flight 11, told the New York Times that he was not deterred by the settlements.
Sara Elizabeth Low
"The frustrating thing is not having a trial date," he said. "The wheels of justice turn excruciatingly slow. It doesn’t change my mind any. My desire and goal is to try to find some answers. I want to know why Abdulaziz Alomari and Mohamed Atta were allowed to walk on planes in Portland, Me., with prohibited weapons. I want somebody to tell me why that happened."
By now, it should be evident that the court of Alvin K. Hellerstein is not likely to produce the answers that Mr. Low wants. Hellerstein's court is clearly part of the apparatus for concealing the truth of what really happened on 9-11.
Why, for example, have individuals peripheral to the 9-11 crimes been put on trial while key suspects like Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM), the confessed "mastermind," are kept locked up in their cells in Guantanamo, Cuba? What kind of discovery is going on there?
Discovery - Guantanamo Style… But where's the justice?
If Hellerstein were truly interested in getting answers about how and why 9-11 happened wouldn't he request that KSM be brought to his courtroom in New York City? How can the "mastermind" of 9-11 not be part of the legal process that Hellerstein is overseeing? Why is this key suspect, the "mastermind" of 9-11, being protected?
To understand how a small group of dedicated individuals can conceal the truth of a huge crime it is necessary to know how the cover-up works.
In a criminal cover-up, like that at work with 9-11, there are three main processes that need to be controlled:
1. the investigation - primarily the collection and confiscation of evidence;
2. the interpretation of the event by mass media and appointed official commissions;
3. the prosecution and litigation of lawsuits pertaining to the crime.
It can be assumed that the people involved in the 9-11 cover-up are connected to the perpetrators of the crime.
In the case of 9-11, the people who controlled each and every one of these three key processes: investigation, interpretation, and prosecution, are Zionist Jews who share a dedication and loyalty to the State of Israel.
The fact that Zionists have played key roles in the covering-up of the truth of 9-11 suggests that the Israeli role in the crimes of 9-11 was much greater than most people realize. That is to say that the Israeli agents monitoring the Arab suspects were actually part of an operation that the Mossad was controlling.
"To those who have investigated just what the Israelis were up to that day, the case raises one dreadful possibility: that Israeli intelligence had been shadowing the al-Qaeda hijackers as they moved from the Middle East through Europe and into America where they trained as pilots and prepared to suicide-bomb the symbolic heart of the United States. And the motive? To bind America in blood and mutual suffering to the Israeli cause," Scotland's award-winning journalist Neil Mackay wrote in The Sunday Herald of November 2, 2003:
We are now deep in conspiracy theory territory. But there is more than a little circumstantial evidence to show that Mossad - whose motto is "By way of deception, thou shalt do war" - was spying on Arab extremists in the USA and may have known that September 11 was in the offing, yet decided to withhold vital information from their American counterparts which could have prevented the terror attacks.
Mackay's article concluded:
"Certainly, it seems, Israel was spying within the borders of the United States and it is equally certain that the targets were Islamic extremists probably linked to September 11. But did Israel know in advance that the Twin Towers would be hit and the world plunged into a war without end; a war which would give Israel the power to strike its enemies almost without limit? That's a conspiracy theory too far, perhaps. But the unpleasant feeling that, in this age of spin and secrets, we do not know the full and unadulterated truth won't go away. Maybe we can guess, but it's for the history books to discover and decide."
I disagree with Mackay and others who say it is "for the history books to discover and decide." The evidence of Israeli prior knowledge of the attacks is well-documented and the names and roles of the key players in the Zionist cover-up are known.
Understanding the foreign agenda and dual-nationals involved at every point of the cover-up is key to understanding who was truly behind the terrorist mass murder of 9-11.
To understand how the three key phases of the 9-11 cover-up were controlled, I recommend the following articles:
Asst. Attorney General Michael Chertoff, the Israeli-American dual national responsible for the Criminal Division of the Dept. of Justice in 2001 and 2002, was the key Zionist agent controlling the "non-investigation" of 9-11. Here he whispers in the ear of John Ashcroft, a Zionist lackey from Missouri.
The key player involved in the "non-investigation" of 9-11 was the Israeli-American Asst. Attorney General Michael Chertoff. He was assisted with evidence from the Pentagon by Chuck Rosenberg.
The controlled media in the United States has avoided the evidence and questions about 9-11 for 6 years.
ThE crucial 9-11 discovery and litigation process has been handled by two Zionist judges, Alvin K. Hellerstein and Michael B. Mukasey. Mukasey is the nominee to be the next U.S. Attorney General.
Christopher Bollyn is an independent journalist
who depends entirely on the generous support of readers
to fund his research and writing.
If you appreciate his research and find it worthwhile,
please visit the donation page and send a donation. Thank you!